Episode 268 - What Authors Should Not Learn from Movies with Rene Gutteridge

Are you getting value from the podcast? Consider supporting me on Patreon or through Buy Me a Coffee!

Amazon Music | Apple Podcasts | Spotify | Overcast | Castbox | Pocket Casts | Podbean | Player FM | TuneIn | YouTube

Rene Gutteridge discusses WHAT AUTHORS SHOULD NOT LEARN FROM MOVIES, including
how crucial point of view and inner monologue are in novel writing compared to the visual storytelling required in movies; how writers can mistakenly adopt a 'director's' approach, leading to overly descriptive and less engaging prose; and delve the science behind the different brain functions of hobbyist writers versus professional authors. We touch on how conciseness in movies contrasts with the depth needed in novels, using examples like Dennis Lehane’s MYSTIC RIVER, and discuss practical strategies for maintaining engaging pacing in fiction without losing substance.
 
Rene Gutteridge is the multi-genre author of 24 novels plus several non-fiction titles. Her indie film SKID won deadCenter’s Best Oklahoma Feature in 2015, and her novel MY LIFE AS A DOORMAT was adapted into the Hallmark movie LOVE’S COMPLICATED. She is co-writer on the feature film FAMILY CAMP, a Movieguide award winner and a Dove Award nominee for 2023. She is also a Screencraft finalist in true crime. Rene is co-director of WriterCon in Oklahoma City, senior contributor at Writing Momentum, and the head writer at Skit Guys Studios.

Episode Links

https://www.renegutteridge.com
https://www.facebook.com/ReneGutteridgeAuthor
Episode 253 - Navigating the Worlds of Fiction and Film with Rene Gutteridge

Summary

This week on The Indy Author Podcast, Matty Dalrymple talks with returning guest Rene Gutteridge about the intricate relationship between writing fiction and the art of filmmaking, and how writers can effectively leverage these insights. The conversation delves deep into the various differences between storytelling in novels and films, and what authors can potentially learn—or, crucially, avoid learning—from movies when crafting their stories.
 
Rene discusses the tendency of writers to “direct” characters in novels as they might in a film. She advises against this, emphasizing that writing should not merely mimic movies because, while films focus more on what can be visually and briskly presented, novel writing thrives in its ability to explore the inner thoughts and perceptions of characters. She highlights a key point: “If you could take that chapter and go set up a movie camera and film it as is, you're not nailing it.” Rene shares an example of “directing” a character unnecessarily by describing mundane actions like making coffee without adding emotional or motivational subtext.
 
A notable aspect of their discussion is the scientific study Rene cites, comparing the brain activities of new versus professional writers when they write. The study found that experienced writers activated the speech part of the brain, emphasizing writing from a character’s internal point of view rather than an external, visual one. This distinction helps inform Rene’s belief that writing, even in third person, should delve deeply into a character’s psyche to resonate with readers on a more profound level.
 
In discussing the challenges and methods of effectively writing in deep point of view, Rene illustrates how characters perceive the world based on past experiences, profession, age, and other factors. She explains how these elements layer to form a character's perspective, providing depth that cannot be fully captured by the visual-centric storytelling of movies.
 
Matty and Rene also explore the structural dynamics between first-person and third-person narration. They discuss how each style affects the depth of storytelling and how to experiment with these narrative structures to enhance a story. Rene shares her own challenges with first-person narration, indicating that while it can produce compelling characters, it is often more challenging and less flexible than third-person narration.
 
Rene dives into the pitfalls of adapting novels into screenplays, highlighting the complications of translating intricate inner dialogues and background details into visual scenes. They touch on the example of Clint Eastwood's adaptation of “Mystic River” as an illustration of how films condense what novels elaborate, sometimes sacrificing depth for pacing.
 
Rene provides thoughtful insights into how characters can hold their own through compelling voices, regardless of the point-of-view choice. They delve into how authors can learn from cinematic techniques in terms of pacing and economy while ensuring these methods serve rather than hinder the depth and relatability of the written word.
 
In concluding the episode, both Matty and Rene reflect on the crucial aspect of intentionality in writing. Everything on the page should intentionally contribute to character development and plot progression—that's how readers become invested.